xmlvalid
Sign in Open validator

BR-DE-21

Das Element "Specification identifier" (BT-24) soll syntaktisch der Kennung des Standards XRechnung entsprechen.

warning: reported, still valid

Why it fails

  • The specification identifier (BT-24) is not the XRechnung one: the invoice declares plain EN 16931, Peppol BIS, Factur-X or an older XRechnung version.

How to fix it

For XRechnung 3.0 use urn:cen.eu:en16931:2017#compliant#urn:xeinkauf.de:kosit:xrechnung_3.0 in cbc:CustomizationID (ram:GuidelineSpecifiedDocumentContextParameter/ram:ID in CII). If the invoice is meant to be Peppol BIS, validate it against the Peppol profile instead.

What the rule checks

As the rule set's publisher wrote it. The rule runs on every element the context matches, and fails where the test is false; the validator reports the line of that element.

XRechnung 3.0 rules (UBL) 2.6.0
Context
/ubl:Invoice | /cn:CreditNote
Test
cbc:CustomizationID = $XR-CIUS-ID or cbc:CustomizationID = $XR-EXTENSION-ID or cbc:CustomizationID = $XR-CVD-ID

Checked with XRechnung 3.0 Invoice (UBL), XRechnung 3.0 Credit Note (UBL)

XRechnung 3.0 rules (CII) 2.6.0
Context
/rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice/rsm:ExchangedDocumentContext
Test
ram:GuidelineSpecifiedDocumentContextParameter/ram:ID = $XR-CIUS-ID or ram:GuidelineSpecifiedDocumentContextParameter/ram:ID = $XR-EXTENSION-ID or ram:GuidelineSpecifiedDocumentContextParameter/ram:ID = $XR-CVD-ID

Checked with XRechnung 3.0 Invoice (CII)