PEPPOL-T111-R001

If status code is one of: CA, UQ or RE then there SHALL be at a clarification code in Invoice Response.

error: the document is invalid

What the rule checks

As the rule set's publisher wrote it. The rule runs on every element the context matches, and fails where the test is false; the validator reports the line of that element.

Peppol Invoice Response rules 3.1

Context

cac:Response[contains( ' CA UQ RE ',concat(' ',normalize-space(cbc:ResponseCode),' '))]

Test

exists(cac:Status/cbc:StatusReasonCode)

Checked with Peppol Invoice Response

Check your document

Choose the schema in the validator: it checks the structure first, then every business rule, and points at the line of each failure. It runs in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Validate a document

Related rules

PEPPOL-T111-R002 If Clarification code is OTH then Clarification reason SHOULD be provided.
PEPPOL-T111-R003 Specification identifier SHALL start with the value 'urn:fdc:peppol.eu:poacc:trns:invoice_response:3'.
PEPPOL-T111-R004 If Clarification code is PPD, indicating partial payment, then Clarification reason SHALL be provided.
PEPPOL-T111-R005 Clarification Reason "PPD" SHALL only be used in combination with Status "PD".
PEPPOL-T111-R006 Clarification Reason code shall exist in the OPStatusAction code lists as identified by listID.
PEPPOL-T111-R007 Clarification Reason code shall exist in the OPStatusReason code lists as identified by listID.

All rules of this set →