xmlvalid
Sign in Open validator

BR-Z-10

This id stands for 2 different rules, one per rule set below: Factur-X numbers its rules in each profile separately.

error: the document is invalid Peppol documentation ↗

Why it fails

  • A zero rated breakdown (category Z) carries an exemption reason.

How to fix it

Remove the exemption reason. If the supply is really exempt rather than zero rated, use category E with a reason instead.

What the rule checks

As the rule set's publisher wrote it. The rule runs on every element the context matches, and fails where the test is false; the validator reports the line of that element.

EN 16931 rules (UBL) 1.3.17 EN 16931 rules 1.3.16 (UBL) 1.3.16 Romanian RO e-Factura rules (UBL) 1.0.9
Message

A VAT breakdown (BG-23) with VAT Category code (BT-118) "Zero rated" shall not have a VAT exemption reason code (BT-121) or VAT exemption reason text (BT-120).

Context
/*/cac:TaxTotal/cac:TaxSubtotal/cac:TaxCategory[normalize-space(cbc:ID) = 'Z'][cac:TaxScheme/normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID))='VAT']
Test
not((cbc:TaxExemptionReason) or (cbc:TaxExemptionReasonCode))

Checked with EN 16931 Invoice (UBL), EN 16931 Credit Note (UBL), Croatia eRačun Invoice (UBL), Croatia eRačun Credit Note (UBL)

EN 16931 rules (CII) 1.3.17 EN 16931 rules 1.3.16 (CII) 1.3.16 Factur-X BASIC WL rules 1.09 Factur-X EN 16931 rules 1.09.2
Message

A VAT Breakdown (BG-23) with VAT Category code (BT-118) "Zero rated" shall not have a VAT exemption reason code (BT-121) or VAT exemption reason text (BT-120).

Context
//ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:ApplicableTradeTax/ram:CategoryCode[. = 'Z']
Test
not(../ram:ExemptionReason) and not (../ram:ExemptionReasonCode)

Checked with EN 16931 Invoice (CII)