xmlvalid
Sign in Open validator

BR-AF-10

This id stands for 2 different rules, one per rule set below: Factur-X numbers its rules in each profile separately.

error: the document is invalid Peppol documentation ↗

What the rule checks

As the rule set's publisher wrote it. The rule runs on every element the context matches, and fails where the test is false; the validator reports the line of that element.

EN 16931 rules 1.3.16 (UBL) 1.3.16 EXTENDED-CTC-FR rules (UBL) 1.4.0.04
Message

A VAT breakdown (BG-23) with VAT Category code (BT-118) "IGIC" shall not have a VAT exemption reason code (BT-121) or VAT exemption reason text (BT-120).

Context
/*/cac:TaxTotal/cac:TaxSubtotal/cac:TaxCategory[normalize-space(cbc:ID) = 'L'][cac:TaxScheme/normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID))='VAT']
Test
not(cbc:TaxExemptionReason) and not(cbc:TaxExemptionReasonCode)

Checked with Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 Invoice, Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 Credit Note, France e-invoice (UBL), France e-credit note (UBL), XRechnung 3.0 Invoice (UBL), XRechnung 3.0 Credit Note (UBL)

EN 16931 rules 1.3.16 (CII) 1.3.16
Message

A VAT Breakdown (BG-23) with VAT Category code (BT-118) "IGIC" shall not have a VAT exemption reason code (BT-121) or VAT exemption reason text (BT-120).

Context
//rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:ApplicableTradeTax[ram:CategoryCode = 'L'][upper-case(ram:TypeCode) = 'VAT']
Test
not(ram:ExemptionReason) and not (ram:ExemptionReasonCode)

Checked with France e-invoice (CII), XRechnung 3.0 Invoice (CII)

Factur-X BASIC WL rules 1.09 Factur-X EN 16931 rules 1.09.2
Message

A VAT Breakdown (BG-23) with VAT Category code (BT-118) "IGIC" shall not have a VAT exemption reason code (BT-121) or VAT exemption reason text (BT-120).

Context
//rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:ApplicableTradeTax[ram:CategoryCode = 'L']
Test
not(ram:ExemptionReason) and not (ram:ExemptionReasonCode)

Checked with France Factur-X BASIC WL, Factur-X / ZUGFeRD BASIC WL